By Giles Broom
Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Switzerland must eliminate banking
secrecy and renegotiate tax accords with the U.K. and Germany that clash
with regional initiatives, according to European Union Tax Commissioner
Algirdas Semeta.
While Switzerland agreed in March 2009 to meet
international standards to avoid being blacklisted as a tax haven by the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, bilateral
agreements signed in September with Germany and the U.K. allow client
identities to remain secret.
“Banking secrecy that allows companies or
individuals to hide taxes has no future,” Semeta said in an interview in
Brussels, adding that he wants to crack down on EU citizens using Swiss
bank accounts to hide money. “If we knew the exact amount of tax
evaded, we would present a bill to Switzerland.”
While the U.S. last week broadened a crackdown on
offshore tax evasion by bringing criminal charges against Wegelin &
Co., the U.K. and Germany have adopted withholding tax accords proposed
by Swiss bankers. Those deals “entrench Swiss banking secrecy,” the
London-based Tax Justice said in an October study, which put the Alpine
country at the top of a financial secrecy index.
Semeta, a former Lithuanian finance minister, has
helped stall the bilateral tax agreements struck by the U.K. and
Germany by ordering the two countries to redraft segments that clash
with existing EU rules.
Rubik Dead
Going forward, Swiss banks plan to levy a 26.375
percent withholding tax on interest, dividends and capital gains earned
by Germans with offshore accounts. Revenue generated will go to the
German treasury.
That agreement, based on the so-called Rubik
model, is threatened by resistance from the German Social Democratic
opposition, according to the Tax Justice Network.
“Increasingly there are signs that the Rubik
deals are dead,” said Markus Meinzer, a Frankfurt-based member of the
network who helped gather over 84,000 signatures for a petition to
Germany’s upper house protesting against a “free ticket for tax cheats.”
Under a similar U.K.-Swiss accord, Swiss banks
will levy a withholding tax of 48 percent on interest income and 27
percent on capital gains earned by Britons with offshore accounts.
A series of loopholes in the agreement means the
British government will only recoup 10 percent of the 4 billion pounds
($6.3 billion) to 7 billion pounds of revenue envisaged by the bilateral
treaty, the Tax Justice Network said in October.
‘Still Optimistic’
“We are continuing to explore the issues raised
by the Commission,” said Patrick O’Brien, a spokesman for the U.K.’s tax
authority known as HMRC, who declined to answer further questions on
the matter.
Swiss bankers said the withholding tax agreements may still be ratified and replicated by other EU states.
“I’m personally still optimistic,” said Alfredo
Gysi, head of the Association of Foreign Banks in Switzerland. “It’s
still in the highest interests of all parties involved to find a
solution”
Semeta, 49, is “optimistic” he will get a mandate
from EU finance ministers this month to negotiate with the Swiss in a
bid to close loopholes in an earlier withholding tax agreement.
Switzerland is under pressure to expand the definition of interest
income covered by the accord and provide greater transparency on those
benefiting from money deposited in the world’s biggest center for
offshore wealth, he said.
“Any agreements that violate EU law cannot see
daylight,” said Semeta, adding that the EU’s 27 member states lose about
250 billion euros ($328 billion) a year from tax leakage worldwide.
The existing withholding tax deal on savings
interest between the EU and Switzerland generated revenue of 330 million
euros in 2010.
Semeta said the “best approach” is an automatic
exchange of information, where tax data of a resident of another state
is routinely sent to that country’s authorities.
--Editors: Dylan Griffiths, Stephen Taylor.To contact the reporter on this story: Giles Broom in Geneva at gbroom@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Frank Connelly in Paris at fconnelly@bloomberg.net
No comments:
Post a Comment